Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 220:8
למאי נפקא מינה כגון שגזל חמץ שעבר עליו הפסח אי אמרת יורשין הוו היינו האי דירתי מורית ואי אמרת מקבלי מתנות הוו מתנה קאמר רחמנא דניתיב להו והא לא קא יהיב להו מידי דעפרא בעלמא הוא
What, however, is doubtful to us is where e.g., ten animals fell to the portion of a priest as [payment for] robbery committed upon a proselyte. Is he then under an obligation to set aside a tithe<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In accordance with Lev. XXVII, 32. ');"><sup>11</sup></span> or not? Are they [the priests] heirs, in which case the dictum of the master applies that [where] heirs have bought animals out of the funds of the general estate they would be liable [to tithe], or are they perhaps endowment recipients in which case we have learnt 'He who buys animals or receives them as a gift is exempt from the law of tithing animals'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf, Bek. IX, 3. ');"><sup>12</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 220:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.